No, Jared Goff’s knee going down on Dan Campbell’s gutsy 4th down call wasn’t missed by the officials – Tan Hero

Water 2024

2 min read

·

09-12-2024

17

0

Share

No, Jared Goff's Knee Down Wasn't a Missed Call: Defending Dan Campbell's Gutsy Gamble

The Detroit Lions' Week 1 clash against the Kansas City Chiefs was a rollercoaster, culminating in a controversial fourth-down play that saw Jared Goff's knee seemingly hit Dan Campbell's gut. Social media erupted, claiming a missed call, alleging that Goff's knee hitting the ground should have been ruled a fumble, potentially altering the game's outcome. However, a closer look reveals why this wasn't a missed call, and why defending Dan Campbell's aggressive decision-making is warranted.

The crux of the argument lies in the interpretation of the rule regarding a quarterback's knee hitting the ground. While it's true that a quarterback's forward progress is stopped when their knee hits the ground, the crucial element often overlooked is the simultaneity of the contact. In this instance, the contact between Goff's knee and Campbell's stomach occurred as Goff was delivering the pass. There's no evidence suggesting that Goff's forward progress was definitively stopped before the release of the ball.

The officiating crew, having reviewed the play, clearly didn't see sufficient evidence to overturn the ruling on the field. The burden of proof lies on those challenging the call, and the replay didn't demonstrably show a clear and obvious error. To overturn the call, there would need to be conclusive visual evidence of Goff's forward progress being stopped before the ball left his hand. The available angles were inconclusive on this point.

Beyond the technical aspects of the rule, the discussion ignores the overall context of the game and Campbell's coaching strategy. He's built a reputation for aggressive, risk-taking calls. This fourth-down attempt, while ultimately unsuccessful, was a calculated risk reflecting his belief in his team's ability to convert and potentially steal a victory against a formidable opponent. To criticize the play solely on the basis of a potentially debatable call ignores the broader strategic picture.

Furthermore, the narrative surrounding the "missed call" often overshadows the other aspects of the game. The Lions displayed resilience and fought valiantly against a superior opponent. While the outcome wasn't favorable, the focus on a single, arguably inconclusive call diminishes the team's overall performance.

In conclusion, while the visual of Goff's knee contacting Campbell is striking, there's insufficient evidence to suggest a missed call. The officials' decision was based on the lack of clear and obvious proof that Goff's forward progress had stopped before the pass. Instead of dwelling on a potentially controversial ruling, it's more insightful to acknowledge Campbell's bold coaching strategy and the Lions' commendable effort against a strong Chiefs team. The game showcased a gutsy performance, not a blatant officiating error.